An Incentive For Developers

Provide Affordable Housing for Teachers, Healthcare Workers, & First Responders in Exchange
for a 25% Increase in Home Density

Introduction

Florida is said to be facing a severe housing shortage, driven by rapid population growth and an influx of residents, especially in cities like Miami, Orlando, Tampa, and Southwest Florida. The Florida legislature is considering a proposal that will incentivize developers to increase the number of housing units in certain projects by up to 25% if they agree to offer some units at more affordable prices.

This idea stems from growing concerns about housing shortages and affordability across the state, especially in high-demand areas.

Allowing developers to build more units could help meet the demand for less expensive housing, allowing young teachers, healthcare workers, and other essential workers to live closer to their places of work, minimizing traffic density that would otherwise result. In addition, advocates of “workforce housing” argue that this would reduce the number of workers leaving the area for jobs in less expensive municipalities.

Living closer to one’s place of work reduces long commutes and improves overall quality of life. Workforce housing programs aim to bridge the gap between subsidized low-income housing and unaffordable market-rate options, ensuring that essential workers can find stable rental options.

By requiring developers to offer some units at lower prices or with rent restrictions, the state hopes to balance the increased density with the need for affordable housing. The idea is that developers may be more willing to build more units if they are allowed to offset lower-priced units with higher-priced ones, thus maintaining profitability.

The Details

Several bills have been introduced in the legislature to address housing affordability, including those that offer zoning flexibility or density increases in exchange for the construction of affordable units.

  1. HB 337 (2024 Session) – Housing Incentive Programs

This bill is one of the most recent legislative efforts in Florida to incentivize affordable housing development. It would allow local governments to offer developers density bonuses in exchange for commitments to provide affordable housing units. The legislation focuses on:

  • Cities could offer developers more buildable space or units beyond typical zoning restrictions if they agree to provide affordable units or reduce rents for certain income levels.
  • Developers would need to agree to set aside a portion of their units for renters or buyers with incomes below a certain threshold. This could apply to both multi-family and single-family developments.

While the state sets the framework, individual cities and counties would still have flexibility in deciding how to implement these programs based on their unique housing needs.

  1. SB 102 (2024 Session) – Affordable Housing Development

This bill also includes provisions for density bonuses, particularly in urbanized or high-demand areas such as South Florida. Under this bill, developers could receive up to a 25% increase in the number of units they are allowed to build in exchange for meeting specific affordable housing criteria. The details of the affordability of these units may include:

  • Offering affordable rents for households earning 80% or less of the median area income.
  • Commitments to keep these units affordable for 30 years (or more), ensuring long-term affordability.

Key Factors and Challenges

Even if these bills pass, local municipalities would have the flexibility to adopt or reject the incentive programs based on their unique needs and priorities. There’s some debate around whether this could lead to increased housing stock in some areas while failing to do so in others.

The key debate surrounding these bills is how much of the housing stock should be considered affordable and whether developers will truly reduce prices enough to make a significant difference for low- and middle-income residents. The challenge is also whether local governments will be willing to adopt these measures, as many communities worry about overdevelopment and changes to neighborhood character.

Conclusions

While the legislation still has to work through committees and local government input, the final form of the bill could change. However, the overall goal is to address the severe housing crisis in Florida by incentivizing developers to both build more and offer affordable options. Lawmakers have swept money dedicated to affordable housing nearly every year for the last 20 years, which critics say has worsened the problem.

Senate President Kathleen Passidomo has long advocated for legislation to provide more affordable housing for residents and appears to be gaining support for her plans. “Florida needs more affordable employee housing, and we applaud President Passidomo for her leadership,” Chamber President and CEO Mark Wilson said in a released statement. “Florida’s ability to attract and retain the talent necessary to grow from the 16th to the 10th largest global economy relies on the availability of affordable and attainable housing.1

This issue is not specific to parts of Florida. There are many examples of plans and options that have been implemented, resulting in improvements in attracting and retaining the types of workers mentioned earlier.

References.

  1. Senate President Kathleen Passidomo unveils affordable housing package. Gray Rohrer. January 26, 2023.

What is Your View?

Do you agree or disagree with the suggestion that would allow developers to increase the number of housing units in certain projects by up to 25% if they agree to offer some units at more affordable prices?

Agree?
Disagree?
Unsure?

9 Comments

  1. As long as Florida is considered to be a prime area to live in, we will have to accept that development will be taking place. There are ways to do this such as is done locally or as an alternative there are intelligent ways to do it.

    Reply
  2. None of these address a big loophole. Seniors that have assets in trusts and show little income, while controlling tremendous wealth, are eligible to rent these units. Collier county is rife with workforce units rented for seasonal use only. Agencies, by rule, must use HUD rules. Something needs to be done to include total assets, and not just income, in the qualification matrix.

    Reply
    • i agree we do need more affordable housing

      Reply
  3. We don’t all know our elected officials are on the take. If you have evidence, please bring it to law enforcement.

    It’s a very challenging topic and I salute Estero for getting in front of the conversation. I look forward to reading other comments on this topic.

    Dean

    Reply
    • Your statement is correct but which of our citizens has the wherewithal to monitor any one elected official on a 24-hour basis. Speaking at the County level, should it just be considered coincidence that whatever developer wants, developer gets? Should it be considered coincidence that neither press or radio or television runs stories about this or glaring budget overspending? Or, that when asked, commissioners consistently put up a stone wall?

      Reply
  4. I understand the need for affordable housing, and I think there needs to be equal consideration for overbuilding in the area. It seems that every square inch of Estero is being developed for housing or retail – even though the housing market has softened in the last year or so.

    Can’t we please leave open spaces…open?

    Reply
    • What % of acres within Estero are under public ownership or conservation easement? You might be surprised. Open Google earth, look at all the green. People seem to think that if they can’t see it from the road, it doesn’t exist. Its just wrong. Literally tens of thousands of acres under conservation or public ownership. Over 75% of Collier County under public ownership or conservation easements.

      Reply
  5. If I knew how bad it has gotten here with all this development, I never would have moved here. The Corkscrew Rd. project at a 1 mile per year pace is criminal. This place can put up hundreds of homes in a year though. How much a project do you officials make? We all know you are on the take.

    Reply
    • Louis
      I totally understand your and many other residents concerns about the traffic difficulties along East Corkscrew.

      I will be discussing this on WINK News tomorrow.

      It is not the fault of the Developers nor Lee County Commissioners.

      Firstly developers along East Corkscrew agreed to a Mutual Approach for Road funding so that in addition to the impact fees they pay on new developments for road infrastructure they agreed to pay $2,000 per home extra to enhance the roads. The Cameratta Group paid an additional $27M for roads from three developments. They also provided at their expense run off lanes into Verdana and have recently widened the roads around the new Kingston development at their expense

      So what is the problem?

      The key bottleneck is Permitting. When LDOT or FDOT wish to provide new roads which are signed off by the Lee County Commissioners as a result of the new process established 2 years ago when the environmentalist groups like the Conservancy challenged the developments in East Corkscrew the process was changed so that only Federal Permitting is allowed.

      This has unfortunately had a big impact on delaying infrastructure development
      Thus while the County wishes to address the problem it can take 2 years to get the Permit and the the road building can take 4 to 5 years to complete making the timeline 7 years from the start!!

      It is a scenario that is causing considerable distress I agree. But sadly these are the facts. I wish I had a more optimistic solution for you.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles by Engage Estero

What Estero Residents Care About the Most

What Estero Residents Care About the Most

What Estero residents want to know and how they want to know about itThe results of the Engage Estero 2023 Communications Survey, conducted in April, has provided important guidance for the management team. The objective was to determine how best to keep residents...

Unraveling the Mystery of Development Impact Fees

Unraveling the Mystery of Development Impact Fees

Unraveling the Mystery of Development Impact FeesFew people outside the local, county, and state government agencies understand "Development Impact" fees. Engage Estero monitors impact fees and their use in Estero and surrounding areas. The following information will...

Written by

Allan Bowditch

Allan Bowditch

President

Published March 5, 2026 by Engage Estero

  Be Informed,
Get Engaged,
and Make an Impact!

Engage Estero

At Engage Estero, we believe in the power of community. As a nonpartisan, nonpolitical, nonprofit, we conduct evidence-based research to provide unbiased information about local issues, helping you improve your quality of life.